English should be made as the

Enforcement brings other problems, too, not least ideological ones; many supporters of Official English are political conservatives, critically opposed to government intervention in the lives of citizens. The US is so much larger, home to hundreds of millions of people and their myriad cultural traditions.

If the English language were under threat, matters might be different. Language is a national identity, to be preserved and protected, generally by the expulsion of others.

For Hayakawa, author of the first ELA legislation, co-founder of US English, and a Canadian immigrant of Japanese ancestry himself, this reality was acknowledged, if slightly spun.

Supporters of English should be made as the measure say that English forms the glue that keeps America together. To a significant degree, these were absorbed into an expanding American-ness. Another reason to ban English: But the point is well-taken.

Dismissing the idea that language was a threat to unity, he concluded: Anti-British sentiment was so strong in the new United States that a few super-patriots wanted to get rid of English altogether.

There are several advantages and disadvantages of making English the official language of the US. An Official Language for Americans? Proposals to ban English first surfaced shortly after the American Revolution That may sound too radical, but proposals to ban English first surfaced in the heady days after the American Revolution.

Unlike the majority of the countries in the world, as of now, the United States does not have an official language. Here as elsewhere, people who are isolated by language tend — much like poor people, or victims of sexual assault, for example — to get blamed for their condition.

Such thinking feeds directly into a more basic question of US identity: A common language can often be the cause of strife and misunderstanding. One prerequisite of being an American, as we have seen, is the ability to speak English.

These days, the numbers are similar. In fact, some contend that the need for translators actually provides jobs for Americans and has not proven to be a financial issue for the government. While being absorbed, however, they maintained traces of their ancestry. But any honest appraisal of the situation in the US must concede that it simply is not.

Despite the fact that the federal government has been unable to come to a consensus on this issue, around twenty three states have already declared English the official language in their respective states.

The question however is too simplistic: Countries where language is a major political issue. In southern California, home to a broad diversity of ethnicities and languages, such programmes are proliferating.

He is a regular contributor at the Religion Dispatches blog. This is Alabama, they might say, we speak English. If imposition is to be avoided as a rule, then federal speech codes must surely qualify. The troublesome example of official French policy in Quebec offers a cautionary tale.

Fidelity to a migrant past is not inherently threatening to a national future. The non-speaker is powerless to contest whatever conclusions they draw.

In addition, making English official may discourage learning an additional language, creating negative implications for both international trade and diplomacy. However, it seems that this debate is likely to continue for many years into the future, as both the supporters and opponents provide valid arguments.

European immigrants, for example, have a long history of cold reception in the US, their foreign tongues or dialects revealing them as other even when their skin tone did not.

English started its decline inwith the unfortunate incident at Hastings. It works with speed limits. This negative psychology works with children. Such programmes offer a strong rejoinder to the absolutist stance of English-only advocates such as Mujica, who struck a heavy-handed chord during his most recent Congressional testimony, saying in his slow Chilean drawl: On one hand, making English the official language could help to unite the American population.

In truth, for many English-only advocates, language has become a stand-in for less palatable sentiments, the fear of changing racial demographics among them.Dec 31,  · Why English should be the official language of the United States.

Search Search Keyword: and services, it has made it easy for them not to learn English. In Hartford, Connecticut, far from the.

Should English Be the Law? and requires that the government "preserve and enhance" the official status of English. Exceptions are made for the teaching of foreign languages; for actions.

The French have banned English, so we should too. After all, they are so rational they must know something we don’t. More important, we should ban English because it has become a world language. english should be made as official language.

Well, according to me. Its good know diffrent language, english is the most common language being used accrosed the world, in today's generation we c that the person speaking fluenty is given more prefrence den the person speaking in other language, knowing and understanding diffrent languages.

Talk the talk

Make English our official language. By Mauro E. Mujica, found that 88 percent of respondents believe that English should be declared the official language of the United States. Further support.

Why English should be the official language of the United States

Debate whether or not English should be the official language of the United States. Voice your opinion, and learn about each side of the debate.

English should be made the Official Language Download
English should be made as the
Rated 3/5 based on 36 review