One can be punished without being subjected to civic exile. Money should be of no concern when we are dealing with justice and rights.
Human rights law says that there can be restrictions on who can vote in an election, as long as those restrictions are based on objective and reasonable criteria. Prisoners should also have the opportunity to influence the formation of policy on healthcare, education, the environment and all the other issues that affect the world into which almost all of them will some day be released.
In many countries, people start earning money and paying tax before they are old enough to vote particularly if they leave school as soon as they are allowed to do so. In the United States, the debate about prison voting rights is virtually nonexistent.
But in fact, there are good reasons to embrace it. They therefore cannot be trusted to vote responsibly in the interests of society; many would probably simply vote for candidates promising lighter sentences for criminals. Would I vote for the VERY liberal candidate who is more likely to treat me better or would I vote for the more conservative candidate, who would be more strict We should be finding ways to get more voters to the polls, not looking for excuses to keep them away.
Prisoners have often committed heinous crimes.
Although voters in Massachusetts saw prisoner political participation as a kind of insurrection, it is nothing like the violent insurrections that marked prisons of the s. Both of those human rights treaties bind the Australian government. This is not an argument for letting all, or indeed any, prisoners vote.
They have rights of religious freedom under a federal law. The move to change legislation to allow most members of the prison population to vote will cost the tax payer in administration costs.
If they believe their sentence is too long, then perhaps we should consider changing some other laws, but not grant this one. The right to vote, without discrimination, is set out in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights article 25 and the International Covenant on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination article 5 c.
It should not aim to give them a feeling of dignity or the illusion that they are full members of society. Most important, the Supreme Court decided that prisoners cannot have their citizenship stripped as a punishment for a crime. The point of prisons, they say, is to inflict punishment, not to allow organizing.
We could see politicians offering reduced custodial times as a party pledge. Many people who commit serious crimes are not In practice, few prisoners earn enough to be liable for taxation.
We must also not forget that those who are in prion are not necessarily guilty. By the time she got a new job several years later, the checks had bounced. Of course it would. More and more politicians are looking to reform our criminal justice system, and this would be a common sense way to help them identify needed changes.
The prison system would be more effective if it were accountable to its constituents. But still, those prisoners are not voting for those representatives. Alternatively, police could exert undue influence over the prisoners and how they vote. Although the electronic voting trials were not continued, the proposed amendments to the Act are another way in which vision impaired Australians could be fully included in the Australian democratic system.8.
How do the electoral laws impact on the right of prisoners to vote? People in prison serving a sentence of 3 years or more cannot vote, even if they are on the electoral roll. On 20 Junethere were 9, prisoners serving a sentence of 3 years or more.
Thus, approximately 10, people were disqualified from voting in the election. Some very liberal all the way to some very conservative. So if I were a prisoner and given the right to vote Would I vote for the VERY liberal candidate (who is more likely to treat me better) or would I vote for the more conservative candidate, (who would be more strict) Any one being honest with themselves knows that answer The liberal.
One can be punished without being subjected to civic exile. Some will argue that it is enough to allow prisoners to regain their right to vote after release. But we cannot expect prisoners to be deprived of all rights and then emerge from prison ready to use them well.
Prisoners Should Have The Right To Vote. Giving prisoners the vote would aid their rehabilitation, which is essential if they are to avoid re-offending after being released. Denying prisoners the vote implies that they are sub-human: this damages their dignity and sense of self-worth, undermining efforts to help them control their behaviour.
Forty-eight states prohibit current inmates from voting, 36 keep parolees from the polls, 31 exclude probationers, and only two — Vermont and Maine — allow inmates to vote, according to the Sentencing Project, a liberal advocacy group in Washington, D.C.
Prisoners, too, should be allowed to vote, no matter their crimes. While only Vermont and Maine grant prisoners the vote, felon disenfranchisement fundamentally undermines the democratic rationale of our criminal laws.Download