Pros and cons of college athletes getting paid

Moreover, the demand to pay these young athletes have become greater, as well. In other words, not paying college athletes might be used by unscrupulous individuals as an opportunity to lure to conduct shady business. They Are The Business The college sports world brings in incredible amounts of money.

The main reason for this involves their exposure and play time in college.

7 Most Notable Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

This is because their schedules are filled with training, exercise, school and sports-related activities. Meanwhile, opponents stand that compensating athletes is potentially harmful to college sports. It would open up a brand new slate of lawsuits as it is virtually impossible to have an across the board pay scale.

Critics argue that college athletes might not be paid with money, but instead paid with exposure. Stop Corruption These college athletes are often drawn into corruption by boosters and agents that are willing to bribe them to play for their school.

These players have to manage their time between performing well academically, attending practices daily, and being ready to play games each week. African Americans make up the majority of college athletes at the top levels in three major sports: Undermines the true meaning of college sports According to the NCAA, college sports are more about the academics rather than the profit, a concept that will take a degree turn if money comes into the equation.

This could be unfair to student players, especially those who might need more financial assistance. So, yes, they can definitely afford to pay college athletes. However, the decision whether to provide compensation to students or not is one that is difficult to resolve.

But for the sake of arguments, many people offer their arguments on the topic. Money will only add to this fact. The issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid has been one that comes up over and over, but is never truly solved.

Should College Athletes Get Paid? Here Are The Pros And Cons

As always, there are two sides to any argument. By paying college players, they will have the money to pay for treatment, hospitalization, rehabilitation and other expenses. What about the top level talent? Also, there is an issue on equal pay among players in different divisions.

For example, would a school under Division I have to pay the same as other athletes who are under lower divisions? Low-income schools could be pressured into paying for their athletes, which could mean sacrificing some aspects of the school operation.

While other students are working part time, college athletes are working hard in court, in the field or in the rink, without earning even a single dollar.

15 Big Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes

Whatever sport it is—basketball, football, hockey, etc. List of Pros of Paying College Athletes 1.

Should College Athletes Get Paid Pros and Cons List

With the huge amount of income generated by these athletic games, it should be a no brainer that these players, like their professional counterparts, deserve a piece of the pie.

If students are paid for playing sports for their universities, they might be tempted to choose their sport over their academics. Sometimes money is needed. Its programs might experience budget problems. It is a good business.

Its system could unfairly burden smaller colleges. It is a full impact sport that results in full impact injuries. Should College Athletes Get Paid? Then, the money would be disbursed evenly throughout the school, resulting to lower tuition rates and improved school programs.

Not just a regular issue at that, but a structurally racial issue on many levels. By paying them during their college days, they would begin to learn and understand how to better manage money and avoid these same mistakes.

When that happens, it will be unfair to those who may be struggling as a player or as a student. Should they receive more because they were All-Americans? A huge majority of professional sports players go completely broke within years of their retirement.

For one, the question of how each player should be paid needs to be addressed.Jun 09,  · Without even getting into whether college athletes should be paid, I just don’t see a scenario where college athletes can be paid without allowing the.

Home List of Pros and Cons 15 Big Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes.

Should College Athletes be Paid: Pros & Cons

15 Big Pros and Cons of Paying College Athletes. List of Pros and Cons; it’s best to know the pros and cons of paying college students. If students are paid for playing sports for their universities, they might be tempted to choose their sport over their.

26 Significant Pros and Cons of Hydrogen Fuel Cells. particularly when it comes to the question whether college athletes should be paid for their performance. To gain a good insight about this subject, let us take a look at the pros and cons of paying college athletes.

List of Cons of Paying College Athletes. 1. Undermines the true meaning of college sports According to the NCAA, college sports are more about the academics rather than the profit, a concept that will take a degree turn if money comes into the equation.

Should College Athletes Get Paid? Here Are The Pros And Cons. Share This. it plays a huge part in the reason why many people oppose the fact that college athletes should be getting paid.

According to the same article, “A majority ― 52% ― of black respondents are strongly or somewhat in favor of paying college athletes, while only 15%. As college athletic programs continue to generate millions of dollars in revenue for their schools, advocates for student-athletes have begun pushing for schools to pay their players, while opponents say that compensating athletes has the potential to ruin college sports.

Here are some pros and cons of paying student-athletes.

Download
Pros and cons of college athletes getting paid
Rated 3/5 based on 63 review